18 de maio de 2010

Can an Enemy Be a Child’s Friend?

Brian Stauffer

In sixth grade they were unlikely friends, the good kid and the bad one, the girl who studied and the one who smoked in the alley. They hung out; they met for lunch. They even walked home from school together, one watching, awestruck, while the other ducked into drugstores to shoplift lip gloss, cigarettes, candy.

It couldn’t last. One morning in seventh grade, a nasty note appeared on the tough girl’s locker — and someone told her the writer was her cautious friend.

“I would never, ever have done that,” said the friend, Bonnie Shapiro, 45, now a mother of two in Evanston, Ill., who works as a recruiter for a design agency. “But it didn’t matter.”

Brushing aside Bonnie’s denials, the tough girl told her she was in for it. Sure enough, after school “she and her friends were outside waiting for me, and I had no one, no gang, no one there to support me,” Ms. Shapiro recalled.

“I remember it all clearly — I remember what I was wearing: a yellow slicker, with a pink lining.”

Admiration turned quickly to fear. “She became that person for me,” Ms. Shapiro said, “and you just don’t forget.”

Almost everyone picks up a tormentor or two while growing up, and until lately psychological researchers have ignored such relationships — assuming them to be little more than the opposite of friendship.

Yet new research suggests that as threatening as they may feel, antagonistic relationships can often enhance social and emotional development more than they impede it. The relationships are not all made equal — a classroom rival is one thing, a hostile ex-friend another — and researchers say their psychological impact depends in part on how youngsters respond.

“Friendships provide a context in which children develop, but of course so do negative peer relations,” said Maurissa Abecassis, a psychologist at Colby-Sawyer College in New Hampshire. “We should expect that both types of relationships, as different as they are, present opportunities for growth.”

Of course nobody would claim that hostile relationships are invariably healthy. The evidence that they can inflict more than flesh wounds is writ large and small (sometimes with accompanying photos) on social networking sites, as well as in schoolyard baiting and bullying.

So far this year, at least two teenage girls have committed suicide after repeatedly being attacked and insulted by a group of classmates. Being the target of a clique, or having a string of enemies, is especially treacherous, researchers say. And while suicide remains rare, antagonism is pervasive: studies have found that 15 to 40 percent of elementary schoolchildren have been involved in at least one such relationship — and that the rate in middle school and high school, where exclusion and gossip run highest, ranges from 48 to 70 percent.

Yet psychologists have found shortcomings in this early work. For one thing, most children (and adults) who have had rivals, antagonists or enemies are doing fine, thanks. For another, the results have been warped by a phenomenon called peer rejection: a small group of children are so different from their peers that they suffer far more than their share of bullying.

In a review of these types of studies in the current issue of the journal Developmental Psychology, Noel A. Card, a psychologist at the University of Arizona, corrected the combined results for peer rejection. “Once you factor out peer rejection,”” he said in an interview,, “the effects of antipathetic relationships on adjustment are pretty slight.”

This will come as small comfort to children and adolescents in the trenches, who may be swimming in foul text messages, threats or humiliating gossip. The sting is especially deep when good friends turn against one another.

In an earlier study, titled “We Were Friends, but ...,” Dr. Card found that soured friendships were a common, and particularly intense, form of mutual antagonism. One participant described what happened after a friend left her at a party, going home with someone else without saying anything: “The next day I confronted her, and we got into a fight and suspended from school. That’s when she started spreading rumors.”

Ms. Shapiro’s fight with her former friend was partly for show. The stronger girl pretended to hit her — and told her to run away holding her face, for the benefit of the other tough kids watching. It was terrifying nonetheless. “I ran all the way home,” she said. “All through high school I was scared of her, and we didn’t talk. I just avoided her.”

Most hostile ex-friends do the same, Dr. Card found, and the hostility does not escalate. Moreover, the weak link between negative relationships and development represents an average: for every person with a profoundly bitter rival or enemy, there are others with milder antagonisms, which may provide opportunities for social and emotional development.

In a series of recent experiments, a group of psychologists at the University of California, Los Angeles, recorded mutual dislike among 2,003 middle school students. Unlike previous studies on the same topic, these researchers also compared children who reciprocated a fellow classmate’s dislike with those who did not. Students who were not named at all on anyone’s blacklist were excluded from this analysis.

This comparison found that the girls who returned classmates’ hostility scored significantly higher on peers’ and teachers’ ratings of social competence. They were more popular and widely admired. The boys who did the same scored highly on teachers’ ratings of classroom behavior.

“You have several options, as I see it, when you become aware of someone else’s antipathy,” said Melissa Witkow, now at Willamette University in Oregon, the psychologist who led the study. “You could be extra nice, and that might be good. But it could also be awkward or disappointing, and a waste of time. You could choose to ignore the person. Or you can engage.”

She said the study suggested that “when someone dislikes you, it may be adaptive to dislike them back.”

One reason may be that people tend to prefer symmetry in their relationships, balance in their shared antagonism just as in their shared affection. Growing up is in large part an exercise in self-definition. From a very early age, psychoanalysts have long argued, children develop objects of hatred onto which they can project the traits in themselves that they find most offensive.

The same is true of groups: a shared enemy enhances cohesion and a sense of self-approval. In psychology jargon, focusing on so-called out-group members can strengthen bonds among members of a clique.

Finally, a truly devious enemy can prepare a young person to sniff out and avoid false or unreliable allies in adult life, when betrayals can be much more dangerous. “In the beginning she seemed like an awesome friend,” said a young woman in Dr. Card’s study of former friends. “But then, after I started getting close to her, I saw her true colors revealed.”

Without knowing what those colors look like, it may be harder for people to find their own. “I wasn’t conscious of it at the time, but thinking back now I see that I went into the eighth grade, and I was a really good kid, everyone’s friend,” Ms. Shapiro said.

“It was a role I took, and I wonder now if the experience with this tough girl encouraged me to be like that — or allowed me to be.”

The New York Times

Nenhum comentário:

Postar um comentário